|
|
HIGHER COUNCIL OF
PRACTICES QUALIFIED IN DENTAL IMPLANTOLOGY
International body for assessment of
validation and homologation (Canada)
The reasons for dental implants
Our first professional duty is to inform you of the fact
that once you have had your teeth taken out, you start
down the slippery slope of bone resorption,
facial collapse, impaired health and reduced life
expectancy.
|
WHAT PROBLEMS DO YOU HAVE WITH YOUR FALSE TEETH? |
 |
Instability of my lower and/or upper dentures |
 |
Pain or ulcers in my gums |
 |
Eating restricted to soft, well-cooked food |
 |
Unpleasant aesthetic changes: deepening wrinkles, sunken lips,
my teeth are invisible |
 | «
My gums are going » |
 | «
I can't bite with my teeth
» |
 |
Problems with digestion, excess stomach acid, stomach ulcers,
constipation, diarrhoea |
 |
Creaking jaw, pain in the articulations of the lower jaw |
 |
Headaches, earache, neck pain, migraines |
 |
Fear of having to remove my dentures in hospital |
|
|
 |
Food gets under my dentures |
 |
I have a fear of losing my dentures in public, even if it has
never happened to me |
 |
I sometimes refuse to join friends in a meal because I'm
afraid of not being able to chew the food served |
 |
I am increasingly worried about the fact that the volume of
bone in my upper and/or lower jaw has shrunk over the years |
 | I
can eat two raw carrots or two cobs of Indian corn at a time,
but my gums will be sensitive and I will have a job doing as
much on the following day |
 | «
My mouth is dry
», «
I have too much saliva
» |
|
|
Are you aware of the real impact of an UNSTABLE dental
prosthesis on your health? |
|
BONE RESORPTION
Thanks to the phenomenon of transfer of chewing pressure to the
bone cells, via the roots of natural teeth, bone height is
maintained throughout our whole life.
Lower jaws...

With
Toothless
Toothless teeth
for 15
years for 25 years
 |
At the centre, 15 years after loss of the teeth, the height
(h=) of the jaw at the chin has already shrunk by 1.5 cm
|
 |
On the right, 25 years after loss of the teeth and the
precious stimulation that they provided, the jaw now shows
definitive bone loss of 2.5 cm, equivalent to 1 inch! In
other words, bone loss of 1 mm per year means a loss of 2.5
cm, or one inch, after 25 years
|
|
|
The
X-ray opposite (A) shows a reasonable bone volume in the lower
jaw, just a few years after loss of the teeth. Implants fitted
at this phase can
avoid the worst, i.e. severe bone resorption (B).
In spite of the amount of bone loss shown here (B), this woman
patient was treated successfully, even though it is preferable
by far to take action at an earlier stage and avoid recourse
to a bone graft before fitting implants!
|
|
A
B |
Gradual bone loss in the lower jaw:
bone loss is continuous and inevitable. In the
absence of tooth roots, which normally transmit the
chewing pressure to the bone cells, the jaws are
resorbed at a rate of 0.5 to 1 mm per year
 |
|
Original bone height |
Residual bone height 10 years after
extraction of the teeth |
20 years after extraction
of the teeth |
30 years after extraction
of the teeth |
40 years after extraction
of the teeth |
|

|
GRADUAL LOSS OF STABILITY FOR DENTURES
Over the years, the gradual loss of bone from the jaw leads to a
loss of stability for dentures that can reach 90%, and
this instability can lead to embarrassing situations at
times.
|

|
Migraines, headaches, neck pain and earache caused
or aggravated by the instability of the dentures and/or by poor
digestion
Digestive and intestinal problems such as discomfort,
bloating, regurgitation, hyperacidity, heartburn or stomach
ulcers, constipation, irritable colon or diarrhoea due to poor
digestion and absorption resulting from the extra work
imposed by insufficient chewing of food by dentures that are
unstable and inefficient.
|
|
Pain and ulceration of the gums
are caused by friction due to unstable dentures and they hinder
correct chewing.
|
The loss of chewing strength and efficiency
among those who have full sets of dentures, which can
reach 90%, prevents them from eating sufficient
quantities of fruit, vegetables, nuts and meat. This
can also have harmful effects on the absorption of
fibres, minerals, vitamins and proteins necessary for good
health. |
 |
|

|
Increased consumption of soft, overcooked food can lead to an
increase in levels of body fats and cholesterol levels in the
blood.
|

|
Chronic nutritional deficiencies among wearers of dentures
increase the risks of cardiovascular diseases such as
hypertension and heart attacks by up to 10%. A Japanese
study carried out in 2001 found deterioration in general health
going as far as death up to six years earlier for wearers of
dentures by comparison with those who still had their
natural teeth.
|
The impact of bone resorption on the face and on the body as a
whole
|

|
Up to 80% of continuous bone loss at the level of the jaws
Premature ageing and facial collapse
Projection of the chin towards the nose
Accentuation of the wrinkles around the lips
Sunken lips |
|
|
 |
Deterioration in the quality of life
Loss of self-esteem
Social isolation |
|
|
The prematurely aged face of this young woman in her
mid-thirties clearly shows the disastrous effects of
progressive bone loss in the jaws. The bone loss here
began as soon as her teeth were taken out, when she was
a teenager. The characteristic sunken lips and the
projection of the chin towards the nose, both of which
are more and more prominent, have contributed to facial
collapse.
In the presence of this type of situation, prostheses on
implants fitted by your practitioner restore a correct
position, provide support for the lips and ensure that
there is a harmonious distance between the chin and the
nose.

IS
THE HEALTH OF DENTURE WEARERS REALLY IN DANGER if the
dentures are unstable?
Nutritional and digestive risks linked to total and
partial loss of teeth
Chewing has advantages that should be better known!!!
Its role is to prepare food before it goes through the
digestive tract.
This is because chewing:
Enables us to eat a wider variety of foods
Makes us feel full up
Combats weight gain
Improves digestion
Enables us to absorb nutriments such as vitamins,
minerals, proteins and dietary fibre
Is essential to keep us in good health.
The loss of teeth considerably reduces the chewing
function
The state of the teeth plays a major role in chewing
efficiency
People who have all their teeth have considerable
chewing efficiency =100%
The loss of the back teeth reduces chewing efficiency
by 50%, and the loss of all the teeth results in a
reduction of 80 to 90%; this means that wearers of full
sets of dentures have a chewing efficiency of only 10
to 20%.
Chewing for denture wearers
Denture wearers suffering from bone resorption at an
advanced stage leading to instability/inefficiency of
their dentures:
Have forgotten the extraordinary chewing efficiency of
natural teeth (100%) that they lost 20, 30 or 40 years
ago
Are unaware that their chewing ability has been
reduced by 80 to 90%
Tire quickly when they chew
Often overestimate their eating capacities: they tend
to swallow their food straightaway without crushing it
completely.
Often content themselves with extracting the juices
and tastes of food
|
What
we need to know... |
Keeping our natural teeth is essential to ensure the balance
stemming from good health, which begins with:
- 100% chewing efficiency
- maximum food digestion and absorption |
Chewing and the digestive function
The digestive system assimilates the nutritious elements
or nutriments that are contained in the food we eat.
Digestion of food frees particles that are small enough
to be assimilated in the organism, nutriments. These
nutriments are absorbed by the bloodstream that
distributes the particles throughout the organism.
The mechanical process of breaking down food starts in
the mouth
Teeth and chewing:
The food eaten is divided up into smaller pieces
Easier to swallow
Easier to digest
During chewing:
The salivary glands are stimulated
Secretion of saliva
Digestion starts in the mouth
The water and mucus in saliva humidify and liquefy food
The salivary amylase starts the process of digesting
starch
Chewing and digestion
During chewing: in the cephalic phase, hormones come
into action to prepare the stomach for the mouthful of
food it is about to receive
This function is affected by the loss of the teeth:
the stomach is thus not ready to receive a mouthful of
food that has been insufficiently chewed, and this has
harmful consequences for the digestive tract as a
whole, such as: stomach ulcers, gastric
hyperacidity, discomfort or slow digestion,
constipation, chronic diarrhoea, irritable colon, etc.
Correct chewing prepares the stomach for the mouthful of
food it will receive. The arrival of that mouthful of
food in the stomach leads to secretion of a hormone in
the blood: gastrin, synthesized in the glands located in
the stomach lining. Gastrin stimulates the production of
gastric juice, a solution rich in hydrochloric acid (HCL)
and mucus. When the stomach lining contracts, it enables
the gastric juice to mix with the mouthful of food and
transform it into chyme
|
What we need to know... |
Correct chewing enables the salivary amylase to mix
efficiently with the food and start the digestion process
|
Chewing and intestinal disorders
The fact of swallowing large mouthfuls that have not
been chewed sufficiently is linked to several types of
digestive problems.
Types of digestive problems linked to insufficient
chewing
Extra work for the stomach, leading to increased
discomfort or slow digestion, gastric hyperacidity,
stomach ulcers, etc.
Increased occurrence of constipation, irritable colon,
diarrhoea, etc.
Significant increase in the quantities of medicine
taken to deal with gastrointestinal problems
The findings of certain studies...
Several epidemiological studies have shown
increased frequency of digestive problems among wearers
of dentures.
Impact
of insufficient chewing among denture wearers
Major reduction in levels of salivation and production of
digestive enzymes, together with negative effects on the
cephalic phase linked to chewing.
Elimination of certain foods that are essential for good health,
but cannot be absorbed
Eating pleasure strongly affected
What we know
There is a reduction of 80 to 90% in chewing ability following
the loss of the teeth |
|
Evolution in gastrointestinal symptoms and food intake
before and after stabilization of an unstable lower
prosthesis |
| |
BEFORE |
AFTER |
|
Digestive and/or intestinal symptoms |
60% |
13% |
|
Taking medicine |
89% |
33% |
|
Swallowing larger morsels |
74% |
07% |
|
Only soft food |
90% |
13% |
|
The findings of
certain studies...
Malhotra, a doctor with the railway companies in India:
Comparison of the incidence of gastric affections among two groups of
employees with completely different eating habits.
Population in the Punjab, in the northwest of the country:
Ate solid foods that involved prolonged chewing
Less likely to develop gastric ulcers.
Population in the Kashmir and Assam, further east:
Ate soft food swallowed quickly
more likely to develop gastric ulcers.
To conclude, the dietary fibre contained in raw and solid foods is essential for
correct functioning of the stomach and for health in general. Furthermore, the
Canadian dietary guide underlines the importance of a diet that is rich in
fibre, whereas for many denture wearers it is difficult or even impossible to
put these recommendations into practice.
A study published in Public Health Nutrition in June 2001, in
which 753 autonomous persons aged 65 and over and 196 persons living in
institutions were interviewed, leads to two conclusions:
1) Over half the toothless persons wearing dentures find it all but
impossible to eat raw carrots, apples, steak and nuts; they are thus forced to
turn to soft food that is lacking in dietary fibre, proteins, calcium, iron,
niacin and vitamin C.
2) About 20% of those wearing removable partial dentures attached to the
remaining natural teeth stated that they had great difficulty eating raw
carrots, apples, steak and nuts; the difficulties increased with the number of
teeth removed or missing.
Another study,
carried out by Renaud (1980) states that:
92% of denture wearers limit themselves to a soft diet, and 66% of them
swallow large mouthfuls of poorly chewed food, while 54% say that they avoid
eating raspberries, cucumbers and tomatoes because the pips can get under the
lower denture and hurt their gums ...
The recent studies carried out by McGill University,
covering the long-term impact of unstable dentures and inefficient chewing
on the health of toothless patients, arrive at the following two conclusions:
1) Classic dentures do not provide sufficient chewing efficiency to ensure
continued good health among denture wearers, who have to fall back on
soft food that is richer in fat and cholesterol and contains less dietary fibre,
vitamins, minerals and proteins; this combination leads to a 10% increase in the
risk of cardiovascular disease, and it also reduces life expectancy by 6 years
according to a recent Japanese study (2001).
2) Denture wearers would be in better health and live longer, happier
lives if they were to opt for prostheses on implants rather than classic
dentures for their lower jaw.
Another field
that remained unexplored UP TO NOW
Headaches and migraines associated with stability problems for dentures
It is now known that headaches and migraines can be caused by unstable dentures,
in two ways:
1) A pain is felt in the region of the temporal mandibular joints and it
spreads towards the temples: if dentures are better stabilized, this reduces the
muscular spasms that are apparently the cause of these headaches.
2)
Bouts of migraine occurring invariably after meals and after eating partially
chewed food. The frequent relief from migraines that has been reported to us is
apparently linked to a more balanced diet and reduced digestion problems.
Malnutrition and the state of the teeth
It has been shown that malnutrition among elderly patients who are hospitalized
is often linked to the loss of teeth and the instability/inefficiency of
dentures placed on jaws with bone resorption. Thus the fact of keeping natural
teeth in place or wearing stable, efficient dentures enables people to avoid
many malnutrition and health problems. (Oral Ds. 1999 Jan; 5(1): 32-38)
Elderly people
with reduced autonomy and poor health
According to an extract from the Quebec oral and dental health network: poor
oral and dental health can lead to a state of nutritional deficiency and affect
health, which in turn results in the necessity of taking these persons into
care centres several years (10 years) earlier than would otherwise have been
the case, while a Japanese study carried out in 2001 states that denture wearers
die 6 years earlier than people with at least 20 natural teeth.
Impact of the various therapeutic approaches
Initial objective of intervention
To enable people to eat raw food and food rich in fibre, that they have had to
go without for several years. This fresh source of nutriments is bound
to have a beneficial effect on the digestive tract, especially the intestines,
and help to maintain an optimum state of health.
The importance of nutrition for health
According to the dietary guide, it is necessary to eat plenty of
varied fruit and vegetables, together with whole grain cereal products: these
types of food are recognized as being essential to stay in good health. It would
seem rather difficult for denture wearers to follow this recommendation.
An economic study of dentures
The fact of wearing dentures held in place by implants could constitute an
efficient mode of readjustment for people with chewing problems. This solution
would seem to be more efficient than conventional dentures. Researchers in the
network have compared the direct and indirect costs of these two types of
dentures (removable dentures and those on implants) together with their
efficiency, and they conclude that the extra cost linked to prostheses on
implants is more than made up for by a better state of health and well-being.
During an
international symposium held at
McGill
University
in May 2002,
experts from all over the world came to the following conclusions:
1) Toothless people would be in better health and live happier lives if
they opted for dentures on implants rather than classic dentures for their lower
jaw.
2) Over a considerable period, international dental literature has
covered the problems of bone resorption, digestive and gastrointestinal
problems,
headaches, neck pain and earaches suffered by many wearers of full sets of
dentures.
3) The studies carried out by
McGill
University
show
that chewing difficulties following the loss of teeth lead to malnutrition that
results in reduced intake of vitamins, minerals, dietary fibre and proteins.
This malnutrition can lead to increased levels of body fats, higher cholesterol
levels in the blood and cardiovascular diseases, which in turn can lead to
earlier death.
4) The loss of teeth results in major health problems. It constitutes a
handicap under the criteria of the World Health Organization, as a conventional
lower denture can only restore 20% at best of the chewing function normally
provided by natural teeth.
5) Dental implants are now becoming the standard method used to replace lower
teeth while protecting your health!
ILLUSTRATED
solutions
Chew a steak, raw vegetables and nuts efficiently and with pleasure
Preserve your jaws, your face, your health and your self-confidence
Bring a major improvement in the quality of your life and find a way of living
longer
By
stabilizing your lower teeth
* Level
of stability for the prosthesis out of 10, 1 = Low AND 10 =
Total just like that provided by natural teeth.
1.
Bone stimulation rate out of 100, 0 = None AND 95 = Maximum as
provided by natural teeth. |
With a full lower denture, without implants |

With a removable denture stabilized by two implants |

With a removable denture stabilized by three implants |

With a removable denture stabilized by four implants |

With a removable denture stabilized by five implants |

With a fixed bridge mounted on five implants |
By
stabilizing your upper teeth
|
|

With a full upper denture, without implants, but covering the
palate |

With a removable denture held in place by an implant- and
gum-mounted prosthesis,
covering the palate |

With a removable denture on six implants, leaving the palate
free |

With a fixed bridge mounted on ten implants, with hand-sculpted
porcelain teeth |
The consensus is the standard proposed by McGill
University:
dentures on implants must replace classic dentures on
the jaw1!
As from May 2002, the new standard for efficient
replacement of all the lower teeth is no longer a
classic denture, but a prosthesis stabilized by at least
two implants. Thus a prosthesis on implants for the
lower jaw has become the new standard because
classic dentures often fail to restore sufficient
chewing ability to ensure continued good health!
Important
reflections
Your
practitioner is a professional health specialist who can accompany you along the
path of reflections that will have the strongest impact on protection of your
health and your face for the years to come
Although the
information provided on this site clearly shows the cascade of harmful
consequences, for the face and health alike, that stem from the loss of teeth
and the fact of wearing unstable classic dentures on the lower jaw for long
periods of time, it is dialogue with your practitioner2
that will really provide you with the elements necessary to make a
well-informed decision3.
Denture wearers would be in better health and live happier lives if they opted
for dentures on implants rather than classic dentures for their lower jaw.
1-
Articles summing up the new standard for the general public were published on 10
June 2002 in la Presse, le Soleil, le Journal de Montrιal, la Tribune, le
Quotidien, and other Canadian newspapers.
2-
Your practitioner is responsible for making, mounting and adjusting dentures on
implants. The dental surgeon* is responsible for fitting the implants.
3-
The fact of fitting implants involves risks that will be explained to you
clearly when you consult one of the practitioners and one of the dentists*. In
some very rare cases, it may be preferable not to fit implants.
WARNING: the information set out in this document represents an opinion held
jointly by practitioners and dental surgeons* who are members of the Higher
Council of Practitioners Qualified in Dental Implantology and it has to be
completed by dialogue with the professional specialists whom you usually consult
and by further reading, in the knowledge of the fact that points of view differ
from one author to another and from one professional specialist to another.
*A dental surgeon is a general dentist.
|